Search This Blog


Today I am screaming internally with the weakness, shifting, crushing pain, the throbbing numbness, torture from the simplest noise or movement.
Everything feels broken inside me. No path to communicate, to verbalise, to express.
No path to comprehension, understanding. No path to memory or information. No way to explain or describe the agonised reality I live in. Every sound hits me.
Every noise hurts me.
Every unexpected invasion of my space paralyses me.
My muscles are dead to feeling but alive to pain. Contact so exquisitely unbearable it is impossible to convey the sensation it engenders or the pain level.
This forces me into intolerable, invisible isolation. For even if I am in the same room as you I am not experiencing you or the environment in the same way. Even the sound of your breathing can be an irritation to me because it is assaulting my senses.
The I that is me, is trapped deep within me, suppressed and compressed into smaller and darker spaces as eyes stare, vision is lost, mind is shut down and blocked out, thought and interpretation impossible.
My eyes may even shut and refuse to open. I may look asleep or my breathing so shallow I seem possibly dead.
No movement at all is possible, leaving a sense of straight-jacketing external pain and jellifying empty nothing, within the muscles, at the same time.
This is a stark and shocking reality few want to know about or try to understand. It is endless. It is relentless. It is tormenting.
Sound itself, even ordinary noise, can literally torture me repeatedly. Easier to pretend that we are ok, than to try to reach out in common humanity to try and grasp what I am experiencing and reach out in genuine empathy.
Easier to say, 'Hope you are well,' than to acknowledge the extreme suffering and social separation of 25 years of agonised, repeated, daily and nightly paralysis and the intolerable indescribable pain and hypersensitivity that I have had to endure without adequate medical help or recognition.
Today is another lost day. A day when I could have, should have, would have....., except I could not, did not, was, because of profoundly disabling Hyperacusis and painful Periodic Paralysis, leaving me asking when will the help I need, the medical recognition, the right support actually be there?
How long do I have to endure the unendurable, without the right clinical input, in utter isolation due to Severe illness?
How loud do you have to shout to be heard?


The potential for deprivation of liberty under the Mental Capacity Act is worrying, especially for people with Severe ME.
We are all aware of how Sophia Mirza was sectioned under the Mental Health Act and the terrible consequences.
Our hearts go out to Karina Hansen in Denmark, for all she has endured.
The Edith Ellen Foundation are organizing a Conference :
MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005, A DECADE ON , for families in Norfolk.

Channelopathy : an important issue for those with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.

 Stop what you are doing right now and be prepared to lose all possibility, all plans, all intention, all the things you take for granted. ” Linda Crowhurst (2016)

This is what happens each time paralysis repeatedly strikes.

We are extremely concerned that paralysis is not treated as if it is part of ME today. Paralysis, a recognised part of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis is generally ignored, down played, disrespected or treated as not real.

Who is treating or researching or taking paralysis seriously as a fundamental symptom especially in Severe ME? 

We know of no one to turn to who can help and advise and support the detailed investigation needed for this particularly devastating symptom.Living tortured, isolated, neglected lives of silent agony on the furthest edges of existence, people with a Severe ME diagnosis are some of the most tormented and isolated, neglected people in the UK.  

Their illness is a trauma and a tragedy.  The clinical expertise they need to treat them is currently not being provided. The most severely ill suffer indescribably, their quality of life is worse than most illnesses imaginable (Hvidberg et al 2015), particularly because deterioration can be instant, unpredictable and severe, following even the slightest interaction or intervention. 

The disease goes on for decades and decades, without resolution or proper recognition.It has always struck us as odd that with clinical evidence of widespread neuroinflammation  in the brain of patients with ME, associated with the severity of neuropsychological symptoms,  (Jason et al 2015) no medical professional has ever investigated this in my profoundly ill wife.

You would think that research would be a key way forward, but it seems to us, when you look at the state of ME medical  research, these things become very clear :

  • there is no consensus on who is being researched
  • there is no consistency of research
  • there is little or no repetition of research to gain confirmation of results
  • there is very poor and variable criteria used, based primarily on a fatigue focus
  • there is no consistency of cohorts
  • there is no way of reliably knowing if the people in the research group have the same disease or the same one as you anyway and no way of knowing if any potential treatment protocol is even safe to try, because no one really knows what you, specifically, have got, because they simply haven't asked the right questions, done the right investigations or looked specifically at you and listened to the much needed detail and of paramount importance, there is no diagnostic test
  • there is little to no research on the most severely ill
  • there is no adequate clarity or overview of the disease, which is perhaps one reason why paralysis is ignored, despite being identified as a primary symptom in the outbreak literature : “Broadly speaking, the epidemic cases have fallen into two groups: patients with definite localised muscular paresis, and those without.” (Acheson 1959)

The medical community, as we see it does not adequately investigate or explain paralysis.  So what hope is there of the person diagnosed with very Severe ME of getting their paraly- sis acknowledged, let alone treated?  

We conducted our own study (Crowhurst & Crowhurst 2013), it  shocked us when we   discovered how many others also suffer  from paralysis. The study (n=46) showed that the most severely affected may experience regular total  body paralysis, partial muscle, limb and  body paralysis, transiently during the day  and /or totally, following sleep.  Paralysis : 

  • can be occasional, repeated daily or weekly 
  •  is erratic and unpredictable
  •  may be accompanied by severe to extreme pain
  •  cannot be broken out of at will
  • is completely incapacitating    

Even some of those less severely affected reported some paralysis or “getting stuck”.   Further, the paralysis, whilst apparently transient, can remain for whole blocks of time,  ranging from a few minutes, hours, days, weeks to months and in one instance for nearly a  year. The paralysis can impact breathing, swallowing and speech. 

For anyone in these circumstances, daily living becomes immensely complex especially as movement and  communication are affected. (Crowhurst & Crowhurst 2013) 

So how can paralysis in ME be so ignored and dismissed as almost trivial, something just to  get on with by yourself or dismissed as not true paralysis, possibly  because it is not nerve  paralysis in the traditional sense?

 My wife's paralysis has evolved into new nightmare realms in the last 6 years, she is driven  literally into a darkened pit of existence by every single noise, big and small, near or far,  potentially triggering what feels like a horrendous body assault, as the paralysis kicks in  violently, suddenly and unexpectedly, mostly without warning, throwing her into a dark  and empty physical world where she :  

  •  overheats
  •  becomes intensely numb 
  •  loses her ability to feel or move or communicate 
  •  experiences an increase in her already intense pain 
  •  collapses with muscles feeling extremely weak and flaccid
  •  loses her ability to think and comprehend or effectively communicate 
  • paralyses partially or totally for hours repeatedly through day and night
  • may have difficulty swallowing or opening her lips and jaw
  •  may experience painful gastroparesis or where she repeatedly wakens into total body paralysis unable even to open her eyes or  move her fingers or toes even. 

The paralysis twists her body sometimes in awkward positions for hours on end, it in- creases her hypersensitivities to light, noise, chemicals, touch, movement and motion, still  further and shuts her mind down in an intense cognitive blankness, weakening her muscles  long after the paralysis has shifted, diminishing and blacking out her vision, destroying her  life repeatedly. 

For someone like this, leaving her without clinical input because she is too ill to attend  hospital, is appalling.   It is not, cannot be, the only option for the rest of her life now, to live in pain filled emptiness, while the world goes on without her in it, for decades. 

 Paralysis has dominated our life together for well over two decades now, yet been dis- missed continually and overlooked, even when tests could possibly have been tolerated in  the past and could at least have been recommended. There must be real answers. There  must be physiological mechanisms at play here. She can feel them triggering and shifting  within her. This is very real, flaccid muscle paralysis. 

Given that the original presumption of an enterovirus, similar to or following on from Polio,  is the root cause of ME, why is there such a difference in medical and clinical response to  the two diseases? 

It is of interest and concern that paralysis, such a profound symptom, has been taken  seriously in the past, for example, in Polio and is taken seriously today in other diseases, for  example Lyme, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke, Brain Injury, Post Polio Syndrome (Christopher  and Danna Reeve Foundation),  apart from ME.  Post Polio Syndrome, a poorly understood condition (NHS 2015), emerged with the eradication of Polio;  there was still the emergence of Post polio symptom some 15 - 40 years later,  after an initial infection in childhood.  

So for those who are old enough to have possibly had polio as a child, and what is interest- ing is that apparently 72% of children were asymptomatic( CDC), so may not even have  known if they had had it or some only had a sore throat, presumably they might fit in this  category of post polio syndrome quite easily, without realising it?  

Perhaps some people with ME, might then have something similar or the same symptoms of  post polio; muscle weakness and paralysis? How can we ever know if we are not properly  tested? Why did they stop using the VP1 blood test to identify ME patients, the only test  specifically developed for ME when it was being taken more seriously?  

The VP1 was not specific regarding which enterovirus a person had, but did, we under- stand, identify those who would develop or have ME. It is a travesty that it is not used today  in the UK to identify and separate people with ME from generalised widely defined CFS. 

Further research into Polio finds that the enterovirus attacks the motor nerves and destroys  them in the brain stem and the anterior horn, according to the CDC, causing flaccid muscle  paralysis. Perhaps that is similar for the enterovirus in ME? It seems common sense to us, that the  enterovirus could work similarly in the brain in ME. 

Without investigation, how can  anyone know? 

Having been treated by neurology as if my wife's experience and reality were irrelevant, we  finally discovered that paralysis can be the result of something other than nerve damage.  It can be related directly to the muscles, to a defect in the ion channels (St Luke’s Health  System), a channelopathy, called Periodic Paralysis which is classified by the WHO (G72.3)  as a disease of the nervous system, sub- categorised as a disease of the myoneural junction.  ( Wikipedia)

 Muscle function depends upon the  correct ratio of sodium and potassium  ions, inside and outside the cells. If  that ratio becomes unbalanced,  muscles respond less when asked to move,  which may be experienced as weak- ness or the muscle quits responding at  all, i.e. is paralysed. (Periodic Paralysis International ) 

Anyone exhibiting hyperkalemia (high potassium levels above 5) or hypokalemia (low  potassium below 3.5) should be investigated for a range of possible causes. In Channelopathy there is periodic fluctuation, linked to the cellular compartments and the ion channels. 

 For other causes, such as kidney disease, it would be more constant, we understand. 


Channelopathy is a complex subject, existing both in primary forms - with several identified  genes for potassium, calcium, chloride and sodium channels, already recognised, as causing  paralysis though not all genetic mutations are known and also in secondary acquired forms,  without the primary genetic identification. Ion channels, critical to the functioning of virtually every tissue in the body, have only been  discovered fairly recently; mutations of those ion channels are now recognised to affect a  wide range of organs and to represent a substantial disease burden.  

Many diseases have been linked to selected channelopathies including diabetes mellitus,  dilated cardiomyopathy and cystic fibrosis. (Phoenix Rising 2012) Every ME case definition  concludes that PEM is an essential feature of ME; a small but compelling literature, accord- ing to Jason (2015), shows “ that PEM may involve channelopathies”.  

Surely a channelopathy, causing flaccid muscle paralysis could underpin my wife's own  paralysis or presumably anyone with an ME or ME/CFS diagnosis? 

A disease can manifest dependent on which  channels malfunction, it can involve just one ion  or any combination of two or more. Ion levels  can be too low, too high, not in the correct ratios,  present in the blood stream but not in the cell  and vice versa.  The specific ions involved with these malfunc- tions are sodium, calcium, chloride and  potassium. (Kilcoyne 2013) 

 Insults from organophosphates, lead, insecticides and pesticides can alter ion channel  activity. Toxins can be key ion channels disrupters because they often  attack the  membrane surrounding the cell, while some  toxins can even create new channels, causing  severe ionic imbalance. (Phoenix Rising) 

There is overwhelming evidence that ion channel disorders underpin many forms of  neurological disease. (Kullmann and Waxman 2010) 

 Channelopathies, particularly a potassium channelopathy, have been considered as a  possible underlying cause of “CFS”  by the neurologist Prof Chaudhuri and separately by de  Merhlier( 2001 )  Chaudhuri performed some initial research, apparently without conclusive findings, but  some indications that a channelopathy could be underlying ME. 

 We are left wondering :   

  •  If any of the participants actually experienced flaccid, intermittent paralysis and  muscle weakness, not just fatigue?  
  •  What level of severity of illness the participants actually had?  
  • Whether paralysis was not considered and thus not a key symptom of those involved  in the trial?  

We have been unable to find this information out but would welcome any knowledge of this  detail. 

Is the underlying physiology of ME, then, an acquired channelopathy that has not been  formally identified yet or further conclusively pursued ?  This seems possible, given that channelopathies can cause fatigue, weakness as well as full  flaccid paralysis and myotonia.

 The focus in ME today is primarily on fatigue, but interestingly fatigue is considered to be  recognised as a mild form of Periodic Paralysis, underpinned by the various channelopathies.  

Chaudhuri appears to have believed a potassium ion channel to be likely involved in ME, in  which case, it is a tragedy that not much more research appears to have been done. There is  further evidence from research by Nijs et al ( 2003) of a possible calcium channelopathy.  And interestingly a calcium channel underlies hypokalemic ( low potassium readings)  Periodic Paralysis. ( Hannah 2008) 

Is a channelopathy an ignored, not fully explored breakthrough explanation of the physio- logical mechanism at play, in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, that would once and for all negate  the ridiculous psychosocial interpretation and treatment pathways? 

Could it help put an end to the negation, downplaying, denial, medical and clinical neglect  and decades of tormented, agonising illness, for some at least? 

What are the possibilities of the paralysis being caused by an underlying  channelopathy? 

As we understand it, the person with paralysis could potentially be being misdiagnosed as  having ME, whilst actually having a rare genetic disease called Periodic Paralysis.This could  be a primary channelopathy. 

 Or perhaps they might have an already recognised acquired channelopathy, which would  be considered a secondary channelopathy.  

Or we hypothesise that ME could have an underlying channelopathy itself? In Periodic Paralysis, fatigue is apparently the first stage and may never fully manifest as  full paralysis; with the potassium, sodium, chloride and calcium channels affected and  potassium repeatedly out of balance between the blood and the muscles, due to faulty ion  channels in the muscles, there may be exhaustion and muscle weakness . (Hannah 2008)  

Today people still do not have the level of investigation or input required to support and  help them once diagnosed with ME in order even to understand the torrent of symptoms  they experience with adequate medical explanation or get help in alleviating them. 

Sadly  the list of very severely affected people who die, keeps growing. Detailed neuropathology studies, for example into Alison Hunter’s symptoms, who died in  1996, have reported  “abnormal disabling fatigue, transient loss of consciousness (“black- outs”), loss of control over electrolyte balance and unexplained tissue oedema.”(Hunter (2)  2016)

  Yet she “bore the brunt of ignorance and cruel misjudgements which left her utterly  crushed.”(Hunter (1) 2016) Sadly she died without the proof and medical understanding of  the terrible physical suffering she experienced.  

The recorded electrolyte imbalance seems particularly relevant, in relation to the new insight  into channelopathy and paralysis. 

Periodic Paralysis 

Tragically, patients are irresponsibly and inappropriately falling into an MUS, Medically  Unexplained Symptom category (Norwegian ME Association 2010), because of a predomi- nant fatigue focus that denies thorough investigation.

 However, open the door to Periodic Paralysis, understand there is possibly a channel  malfunction, learn that your potassium is going up, known as hyperkalemia or down,  known as hypokalemia or up and down, known as Anderesen  Tawil syndrome or even just  shifting within normal range, known as Normokalemic periodic paralysis, suddenly you are  not MUS. (cf Hannah 2008)  

You have a channelopathy: a faulty ion channel. And it might be Primary ( genetic) or  Secondary ( acquired) 

Now you need to know which one and what is specifically happening in your own muscles.  There are other forms also : 

  • Thyrotoxic Periodic Paralysis is associated with hyperthyroidism.  
  • Paramyotonia Congenita is due to a different ion channel, a sodium channel, being  faulty. 

 Your post- exertional fatigue becomes genuine exercise  intolerance and the underlying reason is potassium  shifting, your hypersensitivity to light, sound, touch,  chemicals, become sensory overload and the underly- ing reason is potassium fluctuating. 

You have food sensitivities, such as carbohydrates,  sugar or high potassium foods and the underlying reason is possibly potassium shifting. 

You have muscle weakness and yes, you guessed it, it's  because of the potassium constantly shifting in and out,  because of the potassium or other ion channels not  working correctly.  

Stress, you find out, causes adrenalin to surge and no  surprises here, that also causes potassium to shift and  pushes you into full blown paralysis, because you have a faulty ion channel or sometimes, it  is expressed as just extreme muscle weakness, rather than full or partial paralysis.  

You even have explainable fatigue! Because mild Periodic Paralysis is experienced as  fatigue. 

This is just incredible to us; the difference that an identified physiological cause  underpinning paralysis can make to perception and medical respect. 

So suddenly you can answer the question, " Why is this happening to me?" and the answer  makes sense of your experience, which no one has bothered to consider before; it is potassium. 

The important thing to understand is that you don't just have too much or too little potas- sium. It is just in the wrong place at the wrong time in Primary Periodic Paralysis. Either it's too high in your blood or in your muscle, the balance is wrong so the muscles  cannot work, because of faulty channels and that leads to flaccid muscle paralysis. 

Paralysis  can be found to be: 

  •  partial 
  • in a muscle or group of muscles 
  • in a limb 
  •  one sided 
  •  whole body 
  •  stomach 
  • facial palsy 

The paralysis may vary each time it occurs or may be dependent on which trigger causes it  to manifest. It is important to try and identify the triggers as they may be different for each  person and which channelopathy underpins it.

 For some people it may happen :

  •  after exercise or overuse of muscles 
  • after sleep  
  •  resting
  •  just sitting still too long  
  •  getting too cold or too hot  
  • just eating too much of the wrong food, like carbohydrates or sugar or high potassium  foods 
  • due to stress, because of the adrenalin impact 

Even if you do not have a primary, genetic mutation causing muscle weakness and repeated  paralysis, perhaps you could have a secondary, acquired channelopathy.  Both hypo- and hyperkalemia of any origin can result in muscle weakness or paralysis, with  the patient remaining weak until the underlying cause of potassium alteration is identified  and treated. (Fialho & Hannah 2007) 

The secondary Periodic Paralyses have distinct differences to Primary Periodic Paralysis  however, they tend to have both much higher and lower Potassium readings.  

They may be triggered by various causes: 

  • endocrine system  (ie hypo and hyper aldosteronism)
  • drugs ( ie excess potassium sparing diuretics) 
  •  poisoning ( ie toluene and cadmium)  
  •  gastro- intestinal ( ie excessive vomiting, diarrhea) 

We understand that environmental toxins or certain viral infections, could also result in  channelopathies, leading us to wonder whether ME is in fact a potential channelopathy too?  (Phoenix Rising )

 Hope for people suffering repeated paralysis 

Does any of this sound familiar to you?  It might, if you have had periodic repeated  paralysis over decades without any explana- tion and been fobbed off repeatedly by  neurologists not interested in pursuing it  properly. 

And it's not just potassium channels, there are calcium and sodium  channels, all with different gene mutations  that can cause Periodic Paralysis.  

Suddenly everything makes new sense, if only  you can find out whether and what form of  channelopathy you might have and what measurable figure of potassium that your paralysis  kicks in at, because it can vary.  

There is a whole world of justified states here all provable, though not all yet identified  requiring medical investigation, advice and recommendation because it ultimately can  affect muscles, the heart and other organs and do permanent damage, even lead to death. 

 This is however a specialist subject and you need to find someone who understands it in  depth. It  is important to know that not all genetic forms have been identified in Primary Periodic  Paralysis. So we ask : 

  • Why aren't people who experience repeated paralysis with an ME diagnosis, being  checked out for this, as standard procedure, to see if it could be a primary or secondary channelopathy, especially when the illness continues for so long? 
  •  Why are people left house and bed bound without adequate explanation or ongoing  clinical support? Or investigated seriously enough for the severe and specific symp toms they are manifesting?  
  • Why aren't they being automatically referred to centres that test for this and know  about it?  Why is it so hard to get the explanations and referrals people actually need
  • Why are people just being referred, unsafely and unimaginatively, to fatigue clinics  where CBT and GET and activity management are the techniques on offer? Or left  without anything or misdiagnosed with conversion disorder or generalised fatigue  conditions? 

People should surely be given the respect of investigation and explanation of their very real  paralysis, not dismissal and left with nothing, for decades, especially once the the illness goes  on and on. Though we also recognise that once you are very severely affected testing may be  completely out of reach or requires imaginative service response. 

People need to know if they have been misdiagnosed or have missed a diagnosis.  If with ME it could be identified that you have a channelopathy, we believe there is new  hope for some. At least people might be safer if it were identified! At least there could be  more recognition and help, new ideas, new research?

 Why, as ever, has this important research not been followed up, to definitely confirm or  rule out this important issue, for people diagnosed with ME, especially on those most likely  to show up the channelopathy, the ones who are actually exhibiting paralysis? It just makes  no medical sense. 

If ME's core mechanism could be a channelopathy, why are we still waiting to know? As this diagram shows, people are currently left in ME world with nothing, whilst people  with a firm Periodic Paralysis diagnosis, experiencing very similar, if not the same, symptoms, can be given proper medical explanations, recognition and potentially hope or at least  the respect of a clinically recognised disease and possible treatment options and ongoing  support. 


 To be clear, there appear to be three possible options in which a channelopathy might  underpin paralysis in someone with an ME or CFS diagnosis.

 Either there might be a missed diagnosis or a misdiagnosis of a primary, genetic chan- nelopathy at play, which should have been identified or there might be a secondary  acquired channelopathy at play, which could also presumably be identified or thirdly, ME  itself could have a channelopathy at its core, it could be an acquired channelopathy, which  has not to our knowledge, been pursued rigorously enough, given some people with ME do  experience periodic muscle weakness and flaccid muscle paralysis.

 It has taken twenty- three years to gain this level of clarity, for us, yet sadly our research  and investigation has not been driven, illuminated or suggested by clinicians or clinical  input, rather it has come out of a desperate, personal need to understand the damage, the  harm done and the increasing worsening of ignored paralysis which my wife experiences  with each passing year. It has also been helped by the support of our GP who has stood by  us down the years, trying to help us figure things out.

 We all deserve more. We all, with paralysis, deserve much better!

With special thanks to all those who have reached out and helped in our  understanding of Periodic Paralysis. 

Disclaimer : 

We are not medical professionals, just two  people searching for solutions.  Please note that Stonebird cannot be held accountable for any damages or actions arising as a result of this  article, which is only for information purposes. If there are any errors, please do let us know.  Thank you.

© Stonebird 2017


CDC Pink Book - Polio - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Chaudhuri, A. and P. Behan. 1999. Chronic fatigue syndrome is an acquired neurological channelopathy. Hum. Psychopharmacol Clin Exp. 14, 7-17.

Chia JK, Chia AY.(2008) Chronic fatigue syndrome is associated with chronic enterovirus infection of the stomach. Comment in: J Clin Pathol. 2008 Jan;61(1):1-2.

Christopher and Danna Reeve Foundation Causes of paralysis

Crowhurst G, Crowhurst L (2013) Paralysis, a qualitative study of people with Severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis

Crowhurst L(2016) Severe ME : contemplate paralysis if you can

de Meirleir(2001) Research paper presented by Kenny de Meirleir (Brussels, Belgium) to The Sydney ME Clinical and Scientific Conference, December 2001

Fialho & Hannah 2007 Periodic paralysis Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 86 (3rd series)

Hvidberg MF et al (2015) The Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Michael Falk Hvidberg,Louise Schouborg Brinth, Anne V. Olesen, Karin D. Petersen andLars Ehlers PLoS One. 2015; 10(7): e0132421.Published online 2015 Jul 6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132421

Hunter C (1) (2016) Remembering Alison Hunter 1976 – 1996

Hunter C (2) (2016) Case report: Alison Hunter

Jason et al (2015) Myalgic Encephalomyelitis: Symptoms and Biomarkers

Kilcoyne M (2013) Ion Channelopathy

Kullmann D and Waxman S.G.(2010) Neurological channelopathies: new insights into disease mechanisms and ion channel function.June 1, 2010 The Journal of Physiology, 588, 1823-1827.

Nijs J et al (2003) Monitoring a Hypothetical Channelopathy in Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome: Preliminary Observations

Norwegian ME Association(2010) Reasons why ME Does Not Belong to the MUS Category…and So Forth

Periodic Paralysis International Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis FAQ

Phoenix Rising (2012) A Neurological Channelopathy in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) ?

Richardson J (2000) Four cases of pesticide poisoning, presenting as “ME,” treated
with choline and ascorbic acid mixture. Journal of chronic fatigue syndrome.

St Luke’s Health System Periodic Paralysis

Be a trouble maker


Greg Crowhurst Aug 13 2007 

You can’t go after a health care system under the control of the insurance companies and pharmaceutical corporations. That system is immune..” warns Noam Chomsky in his latest book, (Interventions, Hamish Hamilton 2007) , yet a radical US-style corporate-led health care system is exactly what New Labour are bringing about in the UK , shadily and with little public consultation.

The consequences for people with ME are dire indeed.

Here are just a few examples of how big corporations are taking over the NHS : (cf. Alex Nunns 2006

The financial system underpinning the new market model of healthcare is Payment by Results (PbR), no other country in the world is moving faster than the UK to implement it. In April 2006 PbR was rolled out to cover over 80% of hospital activity, placing them in competition with each other. It is an open door to private companies. One of the purposes of PbR is to allow the private sector to compete with NHS facilities by opening market entry points in nearly every form of care.

If PbR opens the door then the Choose and Book initiative is a golden stairway for the private sector to increase business, as at least one non-NHS facility has to be on offer to patients.

At the same time billions of pounds are being poured into controversial Independent Sector Treatment Centres , stand-alone private sector clinics specialising in a limited range of simple treatments, . The NHS contracts ISTCs to carry out procedures at a fixed global price, which are paid whether or not the operations are actually performed. Hand in hand with this are the new privately run Integrated Clinical Assessment and Treatment Services – ICATS.

Large companies are being invited to tender for the commissioning function of Primary Care Trusts (PCT’s). Private companies will then have control over which treatments patients receive and who receives them.

Community nurses are being encouraged to leave the NHS and set up social enterprises and then sell their services back to the NHS, this could be another entry point for private sector involvement, as PCT ‘s put their services out to tender ; to be delivered by a patchwork of the private sector and social enterprises.

Under the Alternative Provider of Medical Services contract, the private sector is being brought in to run GP services.

The ongoing process of unbundling, the breaking up of primary care into saleable commodities , provides many new market opportunities for the private sector to run services like out of hours (already leading to many complaints and putting extra pressure on A&E departments)..

Private Finance Initiatives (PFI) are a hugely controversial and expensive way of building hospitals. Virtually all 100 hospitals promised in the 2000 NHS plan will be built under PFI. Private companies are making astronomical profits, at the expense of local services.

Practice-based commissioning, the transferring of the PCT’s commissioning power to GP’s is perhaps the most controversial of all. North East Derby PCT, for example ,recently awarded the American global, billion dollar corporation UnitedHealth the contract to provide family doctor services at Cresswell/Langwith, despite UnitedHealth having no actual clinical team and no record of practice in UK primary care. As Pollock and Price (2006) point out, this raises great anxieties about the “aggressive commercial takeover of general practice and other NHS clinical services.” The GPs traditional contract with the State is being dissolved. Clinical decision making will increasingly come under the control of commercial managers and shareholders.

Alarm bells are ringing all over the ME community !

That great bane of ME sufferer’s lives, the Medical Insurance Industry which since the mid-1980’s has lobbied hard, with great success, to have ME reclassified as a psychiatric behavioural disturbance , in order to avoid massive payouts , makes no secret of its intention to take over the UK Health market. As Jonathan Rutherford reveals
UnumProvident have vastly extended their influence in the UK. Their annual symposium are attended by government ministers and in 2001 it launched New Beginnings , a public private partnership which has been hugely influential in shaping Public Policy, especially in relation to the DWP’s Pathways to Work programme – designed to get disabled people back into work. In 2004 UnumProvident opened the UnumProvident Centre for Psychosocial and Disability Research at Cardiff University, with Mansel Aylward as Director following his retirement as Chief Medical Officer from the DWP in April.

In 2005 the Centre produced The Scientific and Conceptual Basis of Incapacity Benefits (TSO, 2005) by Waddell and Aylward, neither author citing their association with UnumProvident. 

It is this monograph, says Rutherford, that “provides the unacknowledged intellectual framework for the 2006 Welfare Reform Bill. And the methodology used by Waddell and Aylward is the same one that informs the work of UnumProvident.”

UnumProvident’s methodology is a very familiar one . Here is what they submitted to the House of Commons Select Committee on Work and Pensions : ‘Our extended experience … has shown us that the correct model to apply when helping people to return to work is a bio-psychosocial one’. Waddell and Aylward ,in their monograph, state that disease is the only objective, medically diagnosable pathology. 

Sickness is a temporary phenomenon. Illness is a behaviour - ‘all the things people say and do that express and communicate their feelings of being unwell’ (p39). The degree of illness behaviour is dependent not upon an underlying pathology but on ‘individual attitudes and beliefs’, as well as ‘the social context and culture in which it occurs’. The solution is not to cure the sick, but to transform the culture of welfare and tackle the ‘personal and social/occupational factors [that] aggravate and perpetuate incapacity’.

Adopting this model will lead to a ‘fundamental transformation in the way society deals with sickness and disabilities’ (p123). The goal and outcome of treatment is work: ‘work itself is therapeutic, aids recovery and is the best form of rehabilitation’. A person who is unwell may ‘feel too ill’ at present to consider returning to work, but that is not a valid basis for future, permanent incapacity. The argument that, even if they recovered, they could not ‘risk’ work because it might be ‘harmful’ to their health is invalid because of the generally beneficial effects of work and the ill effects of long term worklessness’ (p91).

UnumProvident, in its memorandum to the Select Committee, argues that even the most functionally disabled could be expected to work at some future point. Illness, according to their distorted logic , is a dysfunction of the person; the problem of illness is located in the individual’s beliefs and behaviour.

New Labour’s Welfare Reform Act was passed in May 2007, its aim is to get single parents, older people and those on Incapacity Benefit back into work. Pathways to Work, based on Unum’s behaviourist logic, is to be rolled out across the country by 2008. GPs and Primary Care Staff will be offered rewards for getting people back into work. Benefits will be awarded, not on the basis of of a certain disability or illness but on an assessment of the capacity to work. In 2008 Incapacity Benefit will be replaced by a two tier Employment and Support Allowance. “Customers” who fail to participate in work-focused interviews or engage in work-related activity will be subjected to a “motivational tool”, a loss of earnings, as suggested by Waddell and Aylward.

A senior banker, David Freud, commissioned by New Labour to review its welfare to work policies recommended in March 2007 (Reducing dependency, Increasing opportunity: options for the future of welfare to work ) that government targets can only be achieved by bringing in the private sector on long-term, outcomes-based contracts. This will mean opening up public finance to private companies, such as the banks. Freud argues that This annual multi-billion pound market, and the creation of regional monopolies, ‘would attract major players from around the world’ (p62-3). As Freud concludes: ‘The fiscal prize is considerable’.

All of this is taking place against a wider picture of increasing social control and state repression, as “the new rulers of the world” (Pilger 2003), the corporations, aided and abetted by media and government, take over and implement health and social policies consistent with their own strategic and economic interests (Noam Chomsky, Failed States, Penguin 2006).These topics however “ scarcely enter into public discussion and the basic facts are`little known”.

The facts are better known though to the ME community, who for many years have suffered , perhaps uniquely , from the corporate takeover and denial of their illness. What can be done ?

Chomsky argues that there are countless opportunities for education and organizing – opportunities he says are ample “and failure to grasp them is likely to have ominous consequences”.

We have to get in there and take on the PCT’s and the SHA’s.

It means day-to-day dedication to the task. It means incredible courage and determination and above all a complete refusal to compromise on the truth that ME is a physical, neurological disease.

The corporation’s grip on the State is growing ever more powerful. Most citizen’s movements, says George Monbiot (Captive State, Pan 2000), are weak and to take on the corporations means also confronting “the states that have succumbed to their domination” This can only be challenged, says Monbiot, by “troublemaking – the sole guarantor of liberty”.

As freed slave and anti-slavery campaigner, Frederick Douglas, wrote so powerfully in 1857 : “Those who profess to favour freedom and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning…Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will”.

Only you can do it.